On April 11, the
Ukraine government stated that it was carrying out an investigation on the
possible use of chemical weapons by Russians. The investigation is being
conducted in Mariupol city, where Russian soldiers were alleged to have dropped
a poisonous substance of unknown origin. Ukraine Deputy Minister of Defence Hanna
Maliar stated that the government is trying to understand the situation, and
preliminary information found the meaning of a phosphorous munition[1]. Andrii Biletsky, a leader of the Azov regiment,
stated that the Russian Federation deployed a chemical weapon on the Azovstal
plant held by Azov fighters. The use of
chemical weapons in war is prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) which
bans their use and requires their destruction. However, it outlaws the use of
weapons but does not ban their possession; hence many countries still possess
deadly chemical weapons. In a video released by the Azov regiment, victims describe
seeing something resembling a fog or smoke during the attack. The victim's main
symptoms were high blood pressure, facial flushing, burning sensation in mucous
membranes of the eyes, dizziness, and shortness of breath. Such symptoms are
similar to symptoms associated with exposure to chemical weapons. Evidence
and Expert Opinion There is little
evidence of the chemical weapons attack, and the initial report described the
victims in Mariupol city as having respiratory failure. British Foreign Secretary
Liz Truss stated that the UK was urgently investigating the chemical attack
allegations, while Pentagon noted that if there was a chemical attack, it was
deeply concerned. Some observers expressed scepticism that the available
evidence points towards a chemical weapons attack. Chemical weapons expert Dan
Kaszeta cautioned against the remote diagnosis urging that such diagnosis is
difficult, and questioned why specific medical terms such as vestibule-atactic
syndrome had been used. Bellingcat
Investigative Journalism agency Eliot Higgins
stated that the symptoms exhibited by the victims as inconsistent with any
nerve agent due to the absence of pupil constriction and convulsions. However,
Higgins called for the Ukrainian forces to make efforts to recover any
munitions used to determine the nature of the attack and the substances
used. Both the U.S and U.K are continuing
with investigations, and Pentagon Spokesperson John Kirby, noted that the US
has concerns that Russians use riot control agents that include teargas mixed
with chemical weapons. President Joe Biden told NATO to submit that the west
would respond if Russians used chemical weapons in Ukraine. Investigations
on the use of chemical weapons in Mariupol city will be difficult for
independent investigators as the city is still besieged by Russians. Only an
independent investigation can determine the actual substance used in the
attacks. The allegations should be taken seriously considering the brutality of
Russians in Bucha where civilians were executed in the streets and their bodies
strapped with land mines. Investigations can alter the picture by providing
facts, and the Russian troops surrounding the city may be hiding crimes similar
to what was witnessed in Bucha cities. Military Veteran
and Chief Executive for Intelligence at Sibylline Justin Crump stated that
chemical weapons might have been used on a small scale to force Ukraine troops
to surrender the city. The fight for a key Ukraine port city, Mariupol,
intensified with Russians besieging the city but unable to capture it. The
desperation may have forced them to use chemical agents on a small scale. The
lack of access to independent journalists and experts is complicating the
situation. Kremlin has not issued an official response to the allegations of
chemical weapons in Mariupol[2]. UK
Armed Forces Minister James Heappey said the use of chemical weapons would
require a response, and all options will be on the table if such allegations
are proved to be true. NATO Deputy Secretary-General Geoana stated that all the
alliance would be forced to take appropriate measures if Russia used chemical
weapons. Mariupol
Humanitarian Situation Mariupol city
has seen some of the worst sufferings globally, and its capture is the core
focus of the Russian invasion. President Putin views the city as a major prize
as it would provide a land bridge to Crimea, which was annexed to Russia in
2014. However, the city has become a symbol of Ukrainian resistance, and
without its conquest, the war is bound to continue. The situation has created a
humanitarian crisis with its citizens trapped in a besieged city. The
International Committee for the Red Cross (ICRC) stated that it could not
evacuate civilians from Mariupol by bus. Petro Andryushchenko, an advisor to
Mariupol city mayor, said that Russians have no desire to allow civilians to
leave the city. Over 100,000
people are believed to be trapped in the city and are experiencing severe
shortages of food, water, medicine, and fuel. Red Cross spokesperson Ewan
Watson stated that they are running out of adjectives in describing the horrors
the residents of Mariupol have suffered. On April 7th, 2022, Russian
forces blocked a 45-bus convoy attempting to evacuate people from Mariupol and
seized 14 tons of food and medical cities bound for the city[3]. Mariupol city mayor Vadym Boichenko called the
city situation a humanitarian catastrophe, noting that residents lack water and
electricity due to Russian bombardments. The Ukrainian government estimated that the
economic damage from the Russian invasion reached $565 billion, including
immediate damage plus expected economic and trade activity losses. Increase
Military Support The U.S and
European allies have imposed sanctions on Russia after the invasion and
supplied defensive weapons. President Putin has bragged that Russia will
survive the economic sanctions imposed by the west. It is time for more help for
Ukrainian as they fight for the battle of their lifetime to save the country
from Russian invasion. Ukraine should be supplied with missile and Air defense
systems to defend the cities from Russian shelling and missiles launched from
the sea, air, and land. Without the missile and air defense systems, Ukraine's
cities will be destroyed, reducing them to rumbles, weakening their resistance.
Russia should be sanctioned heavily, and a boycott of its oil and gas should be
a priority for the European nations to starve Moscow of the money needed to
fund their brutal invasion. The allegations of chemical attacks should be
investigated and should attract more sanctions and more weapons if proven to be
true. The Russian invasion of Ukraine will continue unless military assistance
is increased, specifically more lethal weapons for Ukraine troops to launch an
offensive to remove Russians from their country. Ukraine is doing well with the limited
options to resist the invasion, and more weapons would enable them to end the attack. Geofrey
Robert is an experienced freelance researcher and writer with over five years
of experience. He holds a Bachelor of law. His research interests are
International law, Peace & Security, Conflict, humanitarian issues, and
climate change. He worked as a peace and security news writer for
Peacehumanity.org. and also contributed to their periodic PEACE MONITOR MAGAZINE
as a peace researcher and writer focusing on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/were-chemical-weapons-were-used-in-mariupol-probes-ukraine/ar-AAWaiDZ?ocid=uxbndlbing [2] https://inews.co.uk/news/russia-chemical-weapons-ukraine-putin-war-crimes-mariupol-explained-1569882?ITO=msn [3] https://www.journalgazette.net/news/world/20220402/Mariupols-humanitarian-crisis-grows
|